America’s Fateful Decision On Stem Cell Research
- 03.05.12
- Uncategorized
- 2 Comments
I admire Leon Kass, MD very much. He is something of a Renaissance-man, very learned with strong background in Philosophy and Ethics. Fittingly, 10 years ago President George Bush appointed him to Chair the Presidential Council on BioEthics, with the aim of developing a national policy consensus on Human Cloning and other bioreproductive technologies such as germ line modification. From the outset, Kass recommended a total ban on Human Cloning, as well as proceeding extremely cautiously with any bioreproductive technologies which to him (and most of the panel) represented a dehumanized Brave New World.
Consistent with this precautionary approach, because embryo “harvesting”, and manipulation can play a role in stem cell research the Panel recommended against public funding of new stem cell lines, and President Bush implemented this directive via Executive Order. Most religious and self-proclaimed “pro-life” conservatives – at least those who were paying attention – seemed pleased with this decision. It resonated with a speech that President Bush gave around the same at an anti-abortion rally, in which he decried the “use of life as a tool”.
Specifically regarding stem cell research, Kass defended their stance as follows: nothing was preventing private money from funding stem cell research at any level, nor was there anything preventing additional research with the existing stem cell lines. The national government would not explicitly financially fund stem cell research, but would not stop other Americans from moving in this direction, on their own initiative. What Kass and the entire research establishment clearly understood however was that without public dollars, which backed research that did not explicitly demand a profitable return on investment, funding was sure to dry up.
This is in fact what happened. The United States surrendered its lead in stem cell research. Few are surprised now that Peyton Manning, superstar quarterback for the Indianapolis Colts, goes to Europe for the latest stem cell treatment on his neck – although this kind of reversal in principle still causes cognitive dissonance for many Americans, who take it for granted that everyone comes to them for treatment.
Whether intentional or not, the USA Presidential Executive order issued 10 years ago had strong implications for Medical Tourism. Those pursuing the latest stem cell procedures increasingly find themselves leaving the United States to undergo treatment. Looking back now with 10 years hindsight, I wonder if Leon Kass still feels he made the right call.
I know, how tragic can that be? I was involved in those debates and still am. I knew then after testifying before the US Congress twice and I know now more vividly that we as Americans lost a great opportunity to become the leaders in this very exciting field!
Definitely, George did not have the vission and the know how as to what this opportunity meant for the Americans. He could start two wars but he missed the boat on the embryonic stem cell issue!!! As to Leon, I debated him on various occasions and when one looks at him, he had very little depth as far as being a visionary and open minded.
That’s why he served George W. Bush in the capacity that he did. What a pitty. I now have the luxury of collaborating and advising various international entities on stem cell research. Soon we Americans will be paying foreign companies royalties to use their patents and know-how about stem cell treatment modalities and they will be controlling us!!!! A very pathetic situation for America!
Professor Dr. Zavos,
Director and Chief of Andrology at ANDROLOGY INSTITUTE OF AMERICA
Lexington, Kentucky
http://www.aia-zavos.com/
Dr. Zavos, I tend to agree with you. When was the last time you debated or spoke with Dr. Kass? I would love to get his updated perspective. Maybe he has changed his mind about some things, maybe he has not. Or maybe he’s in transition and does not want to make further public pronouncements until he’s confident of his position. His seeming silence is a little unusual, because he used to be quite vocal on all reproductive technology issues.
In fact, I distinctly remember him saying several times, including in an interview with esteemed journalist Bill Moyers, that reproductive technologies are “potentially the most dehumanizing of all”. He gave this example: “One female conceives the zygote or donates the egg, another gestates the fetus, and yet a 3rd raises the child. Who is the mother?”
Concerning Pres. George W. Bush, I doubt he has changed his position in any way.